I love naming. It’s one of the best bits of my job as a writer. Whether it’s coming up with what to call a five-star spa or luxury hotel, or, most recently, a new dairy product and a retail venture brand, the process is fascinating and definitely fun.
So why am I finding it so hard to find a name for my (imminently-arriving) baby? I’ve spent the last seven months pondering the problem, and now the deadline is looming, the client is expecting my best work and I’ll have to live with the choice for the rest of my life. It’s the single most stressful part of being pregnant, so far. I need Greg Taylor, our Brand Provocation Director, to sit me down and workshop it out for me.
I’m at the point where the Wombles’ method seems perfectly sane. The original Wimbledon eco-warriors would go to Great Uncle Bulgaria, who’d pick a name at random from the index of his world atlas. Hence brilliant names like Tomsk, Orinoco and Tobermory. (I actually did this, and I came out with Honolulu. Hmmm, potty training jokes instantly spring to mind.)
If you’ve read Steven Levitt’s Freakonomics, you’ll be familiar with the idea of nominative determinism. In other words, the theory that your name plays a part in your future success. The book labours the point that educated, successful white people name their children differently to low or no income black parents. So really, names only indicate where you come from and therefore where you’re statistically more likely to end up, rather than your name being the instrument of your fate.
I can’t help feeling like names are a bit more powerful than that, though. Names are stacked with meaning. And we, as humans, are meaning-seeking creatures. We always have been, from the ancient Romans auguring the future in the intestines of a bull, to our hopeful watching of the skies for signs of a sunny day to come. I’m guiltier than most, looking for and finding meaning in everything. Every name I suggest to clients has to be rationalized with multiple layers of clever connotation. So, naturally, my firstborn’s first name has to be rich with meaning.
My own name has a surprisingly unpleasant meaning. Rebecca, it turns out, means ‘noose’ or ‘snare’. (Perhaps this explains why, in my late teens, I styled myself as ‘the ultimate mantrap’, with limited success. I was Pamela Anderson without the boobs. And what’s the point in that?)
I’m sure my parents had no idea of this unsavoury significance. They didn’t have the Internet (imagine!) and nameberry.com – much less momswhothink.com which has lists entitled Baby Names for Future Morticians, Future Televangelists and Future Truck Drivers.
So I’m feeling overwhelmed by a morass of baby name information. I now know, too, that, celebrities get it wrong all the time! Do you think Tom Cruise has any idea that the issue of his loins (sorry) Suri, doesn’t just mean ‘princess’ in Persian or a Yiddish ‘red rose’. Take her to Punjab and she’d quickly learn her name means ‘pig’, and ‘pointy nose’ elsewhere in India. To the Japanese, it would turn out he’s labelled her a ‘pickpocket’. Nice one Tom.
I know this is a problem for writers in other branding design agencies. Someone in Ghana has to live with their grand opus, Pee Cola. A naughty Norwegian came up with Aass Beer. Even less appetizing is the origin of Coca-Cola’s rival – did you know that pepsin is a digestive enzyme? Tasty!
Some brands arguably get it right in Freakonomics terms. It’s common knowledge that Amazon, named after the world’s biggest river, expresses the Jeff Bezos’ similarly vast ambition. And that global dominator, Nike, has the goddess of victory as its namesake. But did you know that the name Yahoo comes from Gulliver’s Travels? Founders Jerry Young and David Filo felt these foul and filthy sub-humans accurately represented themselves far better than their original brand name: David and Jerry’s Guide to the World Wide Web.
And Starbucks, rather strangely, was called after the cautious chief mate in Moby Dick – perhaps because he was the only one to stand up and say it was insane to want revenge on an animal. Does he stand for quiet courage and steadiness? In fact, the founders wanted to name their coffee behemoth after Ahab’s ship, the Pequod, but it was rejected. It’s hard to imagine a Pequod Mobyccino.
So my search for the ultimate aptronym continues. I want the name to be apt, almost to a Dickensian degree. I don’t mean, literally, Pumblechook or Pip, but just a name that fits, that resonates, that creates that elusive smile in the mind. No pressure then.
Perhaps, like Nike and Amazon, I should just focus on what I wish for my baby. Felicity for happiness. Valentina for love. Or – my favourite – Algernon for a luxurious moustache. Here’s hoping for a boy then…
AuthenticityBrand identityKidsNamingPersonalisationStarbucks
+ Add comment – add yours
How do you encourage kids to ditch unhealthy fizzy drinks and drink more water? Rose Cameron asked herself this question and ‘Wat-aah!’ was born.
After chatting to her kids about their drink preferences, Cameron realised that bottled water just wasn’t cool. Together, Cameron and her kids developed the brand – including the name, neon colour scheme and iconic ‘yelling boy’ icon. Today, their company’s giving Coke and Pepsi a run for their money.
When Cameron began selling her brand in 2008, she was walking door-to-door in her TriBeCa neighbourhood, selling to delis. Now ‘Wat-aah!’ is available nationwide in grocery stores such as Whole Foods and Shaws, as well as being sold in schools. One small step for Cameron, one significant leap towards ending childhood obesity.
+ Add comment – add yours
Go outside and play. That’s what our mothers always told us. So how do you get today’s youth to get away from their screens when there’s so much more content available online and, let’s be honest, adults are doing the same thing? Good old incentivisation.
Now parents can monitor their children’s activity levels and reward them with electronic device time with the ibitz PowerKey from GeoPalz. Pop it in their shoe and watch from your smartphone, locking them out of their game playing or goggleboxing if they’ve not been lively enough.
+ Add comment – add yours
I am writing this on an iPad. I could use a notepad and pen but I like not having to write it up later, and I can receive email and text or go and browse the net. ‘Great’ you’d think, right? The thing is, I keep getting…
[bing! - new email]
…ah, distracted, yes these little interruptions keeping me abreast of any new messages I have. Much like reading a webpage with some flashy ads running up the side, these alerts keep distracting me. Why don’t I just turn them off then? The thing is, I have to confess I’m addicted to them.
[bing! - Facebook update]
So I’m addicted to updates on my shiny connected pad gadget, so what? The trouble is when I try to read a magazine article or worse an actual book, I find I have trouble concentrating. The problem is that my mind keeps wandering and wondering…
[bing! - Twitter mention]
…what’s happening on Twitter – have I got any new emails, so on and so on. I have unwittingly trained my mind to accept information in short bite-size chunks and it’s got used to being bombarded almost constantly by updates.
[bing! - new text message]
[bing! - new email]
This problem has been recognised by Freedom software, who have developed an application that disables your internet connection for a specified length of time. Once disabled, you need a full reboot to get your connection back. How times have changed, productivity software that disconnects you…
[bing! - new email]
[bing! – Twitter mention]
[bing! - calendar event]
[bing! - alarm]
I consider myself a digital immigrant (I’m 37 and the first music I bought was on vinyl and cassette). I notice the change in my levels of concentration and find it quick scary – but what of the true digital natives, the kids who are growing up only knowing a world of smart phones and 4G and always-on connectivity?
[bing! - new email]
Technology seems to be an extension of the self and, without even knowing it, are our children’s brains going to be wired differently – or has this always been going on since the invention of the wheel?
[bing! - new text message]
[bing! - Facebook update]
It seems to me we need to embrace technology (you can’t just hide under a rock, can you?). Imagine a business not having an internet connection these days? But maybe we should be building-in some safe guards or quiet time into our lives, in and out of work?
[bing! - new email]
So less iPad for me and more books. That’s fine, I love books, OK now let’s just check Amazon…
[bing! - new text message]
[bing! - new email]
If you have been affected by the issues raised in this article, please don’t message me.
Over and out.
5 Comments – add yours

I was reminded recently that the old adage ‘age confers wisdom’ is still a view that has some support.
I’ve never bought that. As someone who knows as many perfectly lovely but basically clueless OAPs as they do wonderfully sage seven year olds, it just seems utterly ridiculous. Yet it’s a myth that persists.
I think people might be confusing wisdom with experience. No one could argue that the older you get, the more experiences you have, well, experienced. But this alone doesn’t bring knowledge. Having an experience is useless unless you learn from it and develop accordingly, and that can happen at any age.
In fact – and here comes a massive generalisation – it might be that the older you get, the more stuck in certain ways you are, and so the less likely you are to keep learning. If I had £1 for every time someone has told me that they tried something before and it didn’t work, and therefore were not going to try again, I wouldn’t exactly be able to retire, but I would be able to afford a pot of pretty decent anti-ageing cream.
It should never be ‘we did that once and not again’ but ‘OK, it didn’t work last time, so how do we make it better, how do we improve it, how do we make it work next time?’ Experience might not give you that, but enthusiasm, perseverance and a bit of imagination just might.
Conversely, at the other end of the age spectrum, as a society we seem to be conferring a huge amount of respect and almost awe at times to what are often referred to as ‘digital natives’. Largely seen as a generation of tech-savvy whizz kids, who grew up ingesting Apple products instead of Coco Pops, they are apparently the ONLY ones who understand what the hell is going on now.
Well, I don’t buy that either. Being under 25 does not mean you are any more likely to ‘get’ stuff than someone who’s worked with it every day of their career. It doesn’t even mean you like or enjoy digital tech. You might be able to text faster, but a recent survey of under 25s suggested they were more suspicious of shopping online than their grey-haired counterparts.
Basically what I’m getting at in my usual long-winded way, is that as far as I can see age is often pretty irrelevant. Wisdom, experience, knowledge – whatever you want to call it – is much more about attitude and bearing, than it ever will be about when you were born.










