• http://twitter.com/S_Gracey Sarah Gracey

    I agree with you guys in one sense but is the constantly changing appearance a form of consistency in itself? Would we all not get really confused if the google logo never changed again? Also although the logos and brands are tweeking themselves, I don’t actually think they are particularly changing. The MTV logo is presented in different media but at the end of the day that actually underlying shape of the logo hasn’t changed…

  • http://www.facebook.com/grillust.atcumbria Grillust At Cumbria

    Visual flexibility IS the new consistency. That’s music to our ears. It’s a shame that so much identity and branding work is still firmly rooted in the outdated, inflexible corporate design practices of old. One day, design managers (and designers) will be made to understand the advances the digital arena has brought in terms of targeted communication – probably by their audiences.

  • Guest

    @ Sarah – Thanks for your comments. Very good questions, indeed. Although I guess the point I’m making is that from the days of rigid identities being closely guarded and ‘guidelined’ to now, the true definition of consistency has both shifted and been relaxed. It’s less a matter of shape, per se, and more a case of form, for mine.

    @ Grillust – Spot on! The digital space has been a clear driver in this shift. A brand’s story must be never-ending these days in order to keep us all entertained and enthralled … and digital plays a vital role here. Thanks for your comments, much appreciated.

    Harley Augustine